@luminati-io/mocha

MITLicense declared in the package manifest.

simple, flexible, fun test framework

mochatestbddtddtap
92

Security score

0 known advisories in v2.4.2-lum.3

OpenSSF Scorecard 7.4/10

0-100 score computed by this site from verifiable signals only: known OSV.dev advisories affecting this exact version, how recently it was published, and the repository's OpenSSF Scorecard.advisory penalty −0 · staleness penalty −0 · scorecard component 74/100 (30% weight)

Weekly downloads

Downloads across all versions in the last 7 days, from the official npm downloads API (api.npmjs.org).

—

Unpacked size

Size of v2.4.2-lum.3 on disk after npm install extracts the tarball, as reported by the npm registry.

505.6 kB

Dependencies

Direct runtime dependencies declared by v2.4.2-lum.3. Transitive dependencies are not counted here — use the lockfile audit for the full tree.

10

Last publish

When v2.4.2-lum.3 was published to the registry. Long gaps can indicate an unmaintained package.

3 months ago

Security advisories

Vulnerabilities affecting v2.4.2-lum.3 specifically, from OSV.dev — the open database aggregating the GitHub Advisory Database (GHSA) and CVEs. Links open the full advisory.

No known vulnerabilities affect v2.4.2-lum.3.

OpenSSF ScorecardAug 3, 2026

OpenSSF Scorecard is an automated audit of the source repository's security practices, run by the Open Source Security Foundation. Each check scores 0-10; hover a check for what it means. Data via deps.dev.
  • Code-ReviewChanges are reviewed by another maintainer before landing on the main branch.Result: Found 11/17 approved changesets -- score normalized to 66
  • MaintainedThe project shows recent activity: commits or issue triage within the last 90 days.Result: 30 commit(s) and 23 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 1010
  • Security-PolicyA SECURITY.md explains how to report vulnerabilities privately.Result: security policy file detected10
  • Dangerous-WorkflowGitHub Actions workflows avoid dangerous patterns such as untrusted code checkout or script injection.Result: no dangerous workflow patterns detected10
  • CII-Best-PracticesThe project holds an OpenSSF Best Practices badge, a self-certification of security practices.Result: no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected0
  • Binary-ArtifactsNo compiled binaries are committed to the repository — binaries can't be reviewed and may hide malicious code.Result: no binaries found in the repo10
  • Token-PermissionsCI workflow tokens follow least privilege — read-only unless a job needs more.Result: GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege10
  • Pinned-DependenciesBuild dependencies are pinned to exact versions or hashes, preventing silent supply-chain swaps.Result: dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 33
  • LicenseThe project publishes a license file.Result: license file detected10
  • FuzzingThe project is fuzz-tested (e.g. OSS-Fuzz), which finds crashes and memory bugs automatically.Result: project is not fuzzed0
  • Branch-ProtectionThe default branch is protected: force pushes are blocked and changes require review before merging.Result: branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches5
  • PackagingReleases are published through an automated CI/CD pipeline rather than by hand.Result: packaging workflow detected10
  • SASTStatic analysis (e.g. CodeQL) runs on pull requests to catch bugs before merge.Result: SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 55